Category: Blog

2020 Democratic Primary Candidates

There’s a lot of time for my opinion to change, but I want to document where I am right now on the candidates for the Democratic nomination.

Firstly, I will vote for any of these people over Donald Trump. I’ll advocate for a specific platform during the primary, but the 2020 general election is about defeating a GOP that has embraced racist authoritarianism. Any of the Democratic primary candidates is preferable to the wannabe dictator currently in office.

Here’s broadly what I want from the Democratic candidate for President in 2020:

  • Progressive policies — I want a candidate concerned with causes like wealth inequality, climate change, universal healthcare, mass incarceration, women’s rights, regulatory capture, a taco truck on every corner, etc.
  • A meaningful record — even if a candidate’s stated positions are all ones I agree with, I’m disinclined to support them without a record of efficacious action on those positions, preferably on a national scale.
  • Experience with pre-Trump Washington — there is so much rebuilding to be done in the wake of the Trump administration’s dismantling of governmental structures, I want a candidate already familiar with what has been destroyed.
  • Preferably not an old white dude.

One of the thresholds for participation in the primary debates is polling at 1% or above in three or more polls. These are my preferences among the candidates currently meeting that threshold:

  1. Elizabeth Warren — She has a long, progressive voting record. Her policy proposals are more detailed than those of the other candidates. In creating the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau she is responsible for more actual redistribution of wealth than anyone else in the race. She has been incredibly consistent and vocal about getting corporate money out of politics. She correctly identifies domestic policy as the origin point for foreign policy. Judging people by their enemies, the financial industry hates her with a special passion. (Note: I have donated to the Warren campaign, largely because I want her to qualify for the primary debates, a result currently in doubt on the fundraising side.)
  2. Bernie Sanders — Has a very lengthy record of progressive policies and votes. Unabashedly identifies as a democratic socialist. Supports most of the same policies as Warren, and co-sponsors legislation with her. Has the drawback of being an old white dude. Has a poorly-behaved fan club.
  3. Kamala Harris — Good, though short, voting record in the Senate. Is in favor of the Green New Deal, expanding the earned income tax credit, increasing teacher salaries, decriminalizing marijuana. Said good things during the Brett Kavanaugh hearings. But her record as Attorney General of California is troubling.
  4. Kirsten Gillibrand — Has a good voting record, but no stark policy positions. Most notable for championing #MeToo.
  5. Amy Klobuchar — Fairly mainstream liberal politics. Good on women’s issues, statehood for Washington D.C. Is reportedly verbally and sometimes physically abusive to her employees.
  6. Cory Booker — Seems like a nice guy, but is overly cosy with pharmaceutical companies and the finance industry. Likes charter schools. Fairly centrist.
  7. Julián Castro — He was the Mayor of San Antonio, my hometown, and then HUD Secretary. He’s fine, though doesn’t have a lot of policy substance, and has no national voting record. After he gave the keynote speech at the DNC in 2012 it seemed like he wanted to be Hispanic Obama, but the moment passed him by.
  8. Beto O’Rourke — I voted for him for the Senate, as he’s massively preferable to Ted Cruz. He’s socially liberal in some laudable ways. But his voting record in the House is more conservative than average for a Democrat; in last two years he’s been in the top fifth of congressmen voting against their party’s majority position. He’s campaigning on an outmoded idea of bipartisan appeal. A Washington Post profile makes him seem like kind of a jerk to his family.
  9. Joe Biden — Old white dude who proudly identifies as a moderate. Senate voting record is not remotely progressive. Oversaw the Anita Hill hearings. Openly disdains Millennials. Running primarily on Obama-era nostalgia.
  10. Pete Buttigieg — No national record at all. This reading of his book makes him seem like a centrist elitist pretending to be a progressive populist.
  11. Andrew Yang — No political record at all. Supporter of universal basic income, but with few clear policy details. Tech startup guy. Weirdly obsessed with malls. Disturbingly favored by the alt-right.

2018 World Fantasy Award Winner for Best Anthology: The New Voices of Fantasy

I woke up to the lovely news that The New Voices of Fantasy has won the World Fantasy Award for Best Anthology!

Congratulations to Jacob Weisman and Peter S. Beagle and everyone at Tachyon for creating this wonderful book, and to all the other authors whose stories made it such a delight.

If you want a copy of this newly award-winning anthology, which includes my short story “My Time Among the Bridge Blowers,” head on over to Tachyon’s site and pick one up

Scintillation 2018

Above is the view from my hotel window on the 45th floor. I’m in Toronto, en route to Scintillation in Montreal. It’s my first time in the city and I’ll soon be heading out to explore. But for anyone else headed to Montreal this weekend, here’s my con schedule:

Saturday, 3:30 pm — Reading

Saturday, 9:00 pm — Panel: So What’s a Short Story, Anyway?

Sunday, 11:00 am — Panel: Our Real Influences and Why We Lie

Sunday, 4:00 pm — Panel: Where Are the Books Like Pandemic?

Long article on Bryce Milligan’s treatment of Hailey Johnson, Denise McVea, and Gabrielle Marcus

The front page of the San Antonio Express News today carries Lauren Caruba’s article “Unwelcomed Inspiration: Women recount disturbing encounters with SA’s ‘muse poet.'” I was interviewed for and am quoted in the piece, as are my parents and several other of his former students. If you want a thorough overview of his years of skeevy behavior toward young women, this is the link for you.

I recently heard that his house in the King William district is now on the market. Wherever he’s headed next, may his reputation precede him.

Class on Writing and Selling Short Science Fiction at The Writing Barn

On September 13 at 7:00 pm CST I’ll be teaching an online class on writing and selling short science fiction for The Writing Barn. This is a course for writers new to science fiction publishing, and will examine topics of both craft and commerce. If that sounds up your alley, click through and sign up! You might also want to check out the many other classes that The Writing Barn offers, ranging from half-day events like mine to full, six-week courses.

My GenCon Schedule

GenCon is coming up in a few days, and I’m going to be there. Here’s my programming schedule. Last time I checked the first two were sold out, but there were still tickets available for the rest.

Thursday

12:00 PM Boston Artificial Intelligence and Speculative Fiction
1:00 PM Atlanta Convincing Aliens
4:00 PM Atlanta Using the Scientific Method in Spec Fic

Saturday

12:00 PM Boston Dealing with Professional Envy
3:00 PM Ballrooms 3-4 The Long and Short of Fiction

WisCon 42 and the Tiptree Award

WisCon 42 has come and gone without my writing about it, but it was a lovely time. After spending a year on the Tiptree jury I intentionally kept my schedule for this con programming-light. I ran a fiction workshop again, something I always enjoy, and did two panels talking about the process of judging the Tiptree and the works we selected for various honors. I got to reconnect with several friends, including Nueva Madre translator and current Tiptree Award juror Arrate Hidalgo, and longtime con buddy Brit Mandelo whom I hadn’t seen in several years. Much missed though were many friends and WisCon regulars who were unable to attend this year. At the end of the weekend I played a role in the award ceremony for Virginia Bergin, pictured above with her commissioned art piece and flanked by myself and 2017 jury chair Alexis Lothian. Virginia is a delight, and getting to know her was a highlight of my con. I hope I get to see her in Madison again in the future. Her winning book comes out in the United States in November from Sourcebooks under the title The XY.

On Bryce Milligan and Hailey Laine Johnson

Bryce Milligan is an author, musician, and publisher—the owner of Wings Press in San Antonio, Texas, where he’s been a ubiquitous figure in the municipal literary scene since 1977. You can read about his many endeavors in the extremely lengthy professional biography [archived version here] on his website. Perhaps the only part of his career you wouldn’t learn from that bio is the time he spent as a high school teacher, leading the Creative Writing program at the North East School for the Arts. This lacuna is notable due to the circumstances of his departure from that position. He was offered, and took, the opportunity to resign about three quarters of the way through 2001-02 school year, rather than be terminated for inappropriate relations with a student. I know about it because that was my senior year as a NESA Creative Writing major, and he was my teacher.

The student in question was Hailey Laine Johnson, and she has gone public about the experience on Facebook. Her account is embedded below. I’d encourage you to read it before continuing to the rest of this post.


I was told about Hailey’s post by another former high school classmate, one who thought I might wish to defend Bryce’s reputation. That was a reasonable supposition given my attitude back then, but an incorrect one. My feelings about Bryce Milligan have changed in the seventeen years since I was seventeen. I wasn’t present for most of the events that Hailey describes in the post, but I had my own interactions with Bryce, ones that from an adult perspective are perfectly consonant with everything she wrote. I want to share those experiences, and explain how profoundly I think Bryce Milligan transgressed.

Bryce took over the Creative Writing program at the start of my junior year, and immediately won over the students with his easygoing affect and aura of literary importance. All the books he had written. The books he had published. The writers he knew and the awards they had won. When Bryce arrived, the Creative Writing program seemed to transform from a quirky, special-topics English class into a gateway to life among the literati. He was a cool teacher; a guitar-toting, Dylan-quoting free spirit who spoke to us with rare candor. One who made us feel like peers more than pupils, and carried himself as sort of guru, initiating us into our authorial futures. To me, a teenager aching for the seriousness of adult regard, this was intoxicating. When I was sixteen years old, an authority figure need only validate me as an intellectual equal to win me over completely.

By my senior year, though, I had doubts. Not about the propriety of Bryce’s behavior, alas, but the wisdom of it. His social closeness with students went so far beyond the public high school norm that I started to worry for him. I felt that a teacher sharing so much of his life with students was inadvisable, but was at the same time thrilled to be treated as a confidant by a successful elder and mentor. I remember one day, during lunch (many of us spent lunch in his portable classroom), he beckoned me over to show me his hat. On the sweatband, in neat ballpoint handwriting: Hi, Bryce! 

“Laine wrote that,” he said, his voice buoyant with delight, “Can you believe that girl? She’s amazing!” Laine was a new freshman, fourteen-year-old Hailey Laine Johnson, and Bryce was swooning. I don’t know if that was the first time I told him that if he carried on as he was he would get fired, but it was certainly one time. And not the last.

As senior year wore on I got increasingly angry at him. Angry for selfish reasons; if he got himself ousted over some new girl, it would fuck up the rest of my senior year. But his obsession seemed only to grow, and hazy rumors of questionable behavior began to spread. One of the times I told him he needed to cut it out or else lose his job, he responded, “She’s a muse, E.J. Even if I do get fired, it’s worth it. This has given me enough for ten years of writing.”

Those words have echoed in my mind ever since, as I’ve aged, progressed through school, become an educator myself. Each time I’ve remembered them, the more predatory a violation of the boundaries between teacher and student they’ve seemed. I’ve seen their shadow in my vision whenever I’ve encountered a misuse of the power that comes from standing at the front of a classroom. A visiting instructor is sowing resentment among his class by showing obvious favoritism? She’s a muse. A graduate TA with a history of violence is dating one of her students—again—and no one seems to care? Muse. My personal metonym for all the ways one can reveal themselves to be unworthy of pedagogical authority.

But at seventeen, the structure of this violation wasn’t clear to me. What was clear was that a man I looked up to was doing something stupidly reckless, and endangering my high school experience for no good reason. I wanted it all to go away. I wanted Bryce to stop romanticizing, I wanted the aggrieved to stop complaining, I wanted Creative Writing class to go back to being an uncomplicated good thing that I could feel special for being a part of.

If you read Hailey’s post, you know more details of Bryce’s unconscionable extracurricular behavior than I did at the time. I avoided the rumors. I kept myself willfully ignorant of any available details. But, of course, others did not. The situation became a quiet scandal. The administration got involved. Parents got involved. Other students got involved. (It’s my behavior toward another student at that time I most regret. My classmate, Laura, spoke out against Bryce. I condescendingly criticized her for increasing the likelihood of our school year being disrupted—the one time I remember actively privileging my own convenience over Hailey’s experiences. Laura quite rightly told me to fuck off. We were never really friends again.)

I already told you how this ends. Bryce was given the option to resign rather than be fired for cause. It’s possible he courted the sympathy of his superiors the same way he did from me, by saying, “If I were to be fired for this reason, my wife would leave me.” I don’t know. I do know, though, that shortly before his resignation he spoke to my parents at their house, wanting to give his side of the story. My mother reports Bryce to have explained that it was physically impossible for him to have done anything wrong in his relationship with Hailey, because, you see, he was impotent due to his alcoholism. My mother, herself a lifelong educator, was as unimpressed by this excuse as one might imagine. She informed him there are lines a teacher simply doesn’t cross, and wrote a letter to the school.

Bryce resigned. The administration avoided public incident. Time passed. The students grew up. I grew up to decide that it’s super fucking creepy when men in their forties weave elaborate aesthetic justifications for blatant, doe-eyed crushes on fourteen-year-old girls. Hailey grew up into someone with the bravery to share the details of how Bryce Milligan used his muse—a process that I now know involved prolonged grooming and sexual harassment of a minor. The person she describes, with his gifts, exhortations, and “artistic” fetishization, is one that I recognize. It’s a shape that fits seamlessly alongside my own experiences of the man. I believe all of it.


Originally this post ended with the previous paragraph, but now I have more to add. I reached out to Hailey and we spent the afternoon chatting. She mentioned that Bryce had contacted her after her initial post. She put up a video about that experience. During our conversation, she also shared his message with me, and gave me permission to publish it:

Let’s take this apart. He opens with “I’m so very sorry for what happened,” but follows that up with an intriguingly ambiguous “I’ve rarely set foot in a classroom since because of it.” Why has he rarely done so? Because he can’t trust himself in such a situation not to take advantage of young girls? Because doing so risks exposure of that which had been successfully kept quiet? More importantly, what is he sorry for, his behavior during “what happened,” or the limiting consequences thereof on his ability to teach?

If one didn’t believe Hailey, one might read his avoidance of classrooms to mean he feels he must protect himself from future false accusation, but Bryce himself undermines that reading in the next line. “I know there is nothing I can do to make it up to you” he writes, indicating he believes himself to have transgressed in some manner. But having made this admission, he backpedals. He recalls theirs being a vaguely innocuous relationship that was “about creativity,” and implies that if Hailey believes otherwise it’s the result of post-hoc rationalization. Despite this insinuation that any abuse of power on his part was all in her head, Bryce follows by saying that, whatever he did in service of “creativity,” it’s something for which he doesn’t deserve forgiveness. Not that it stops him from immediately requesting forgiveness anyway. Taken at face value, that’s an example of entitlement so stark it could almost serve as a definition: “I feel I’ve an inherent right to request you give me something of which I am objectively undeserving.” But I think it ought not be taken at face value.

This message, with its blend of nonspecific apology, blanket denial, and plea for immediate absolution, reads to me not as contrition but as damage control. It’s an attempt to make a problem go away. I wrote previously that the experiences Hailey described in outing Bryce Milligan’s abuses fit seamlessly with my own memories of his inclination for self-centered romanticizing of teenage students as fuel for his artistic life. I include this addendum because it goes beyond assurances from adolescent memory. If one believes Hailey, as I do, the intent behind this message is clear. If one does not believe Hailey—as I already know some who will be reading this don’t—then this message forces one to ask how exactly Bryce believes himself to have wronged her that he should seek a forgiveness for which he assesses himself undeserving.

Ben Mauk Wins Spur Award

Ben Mauk has won perhaps the best-named award I’ve ever heard of, the Spur Award for Short Nonfiction, from the Western Writers of America. His winning work was the wonderful article “States of Decay,” which I posted about last September. Here’s the Pulitzer Center’s announcement about the win. Congratulations, Ben!

On Junot Díaz, Carmen Machado, and Monica Byrne

Junot Díaz is having a #metoo moment that was a long time coming. I think the first open accusation was from Zinzi Clemmons, in this tweet:

Shortly thereafter, both Carmen Machado and Monica Byrne related their own experiences. Carmen’s is in a Twitter thread starting here:

Monica’s was on Twitter, and at greater length on Facebook:

There have since been this damning story from Alisa Valdes, an overview article in The Cut, and I’m sure more to come.

I’m writing this post to bear witness. I was present for the events related by both Carmen Machado and Monica Byrne. Things happened as they described. I watched the belittling histrionics Junot Díaz displayed in response to Carmen’s questions in Iowa City, with his subsequent tantrum of a reading. I was seated next to Monica in North Carolina when Díaz, on her other side, lectured the table about VIDA statistics and the sexist silencing of women in literature, only to actively interrupt or condescendingly dismiss the woman novelist right beside him whenever she tried to contribute to the conversation.1

Carmen is telling the truth. Monica is telling the truth. I have absolutely no doubt that Zinzi Clemmons and Alisa Valdes are telling the truth. For all the discussion to come, this much is without question: these things happened, just as described.


  1. An ironic cherry to go atop that farce: in both instances he employed the rhetorical tactic of treating his female interlocutors like underachieving students, beginning dismissive comments with something like, “One of the first things we teach students at MIT is….” Monica, as it happens, has a masters degree from MIT.