<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>EugeneFischer.com &#187; linguistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eugenefischer.com/tag/linguistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eugenefischer.com</link>
	<description>Generalizations are always wrong.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A Linguistic Blind Spot</title>
		<link>http://www.eugenefischer.com/2009/11/27/a-linguistic-blind-spot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eugenefischer.com/2009/11/27/a-linguistic-blind-spot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Fischer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linguistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eugenefischer.com/?p=1553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an interesting article on The Language Log about a particular type of misnegation that, until it was presented to me in a context that said, &#8220;this is wrong,&#8221; I was unable to see the problem with.  It has to do with phrases of the type No NOUN is too ADJECTIVE to VERB.  For [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an interesting <a href="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1924">article on The Language Log</a> about a particular type of misnegation that, until it was presented to me in a context that said, &#8220;this is wrong,&#8221; I was unable to see the problem with.  It has to do with phrases of the type <em>No NOUN is too ADJECTIVE to VERB</em>.  For example, &#8220;No detail is too small to escape notice.&#8221;  My brain naturally parses this to mean that everything will be noticed, but it actually says that nothing will be noticed.  Reading this article makes me want to scrape the rust off my knowledge of regular expressions and see if I&#8217;ve written any stories that have this mistake.</p>
<p>A more general note about linguistics: I like reading The Language Log and linguistic analyses in general, but every time I&#8217;ve tried to actually study linguistics I&#8217;ve bounced off the surface of the subject.  Something about the foundational knowledge of the study bores me to tears, for no reason I can satisfactorily explain.  This is useful to me, though, when people tell me that they don&#8217;t like physics because it has too much math.  I can think to myself, &#8220;crazy as that sounds, it is probably analogous to how I feel about linguistics.&#8221;  (I still try periodically.  I secretly hold out hope that some day I will stumble upon a book that makes the foundational ideas of linguistics accessible to me.  And then I will be able to tell people who don&#8217;t like physics that they are objectively <em>wrong</em>. Huzzah!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eugenefischer.com/2009/11/27/a-linguistic-blind-spot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

