<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Behind the Scenes at Asimov&#8217;s on the Sofanauts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eugenefischer.com/2009/10/23/behind-the-scenes-at-asimovs-on-the-sofanauts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eugenefischer.com/2009/10/23/behind-the-scenes-at-asimovs-on-the-sofanauts/</link>
	<description>Generalizations are always wrong.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:28:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Fischer</title>
		<link>http://www.eugenefischer.com/2009/10/23/behind-the-scenes-at-asimovs-on-the-sofanauts/comment-page-1/#comment-5446</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eugenefischer.com/?p=1501#comment-5446</guid>
		<description>That makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.  (Also, sorry it took me so long to reply--my World Fantasy trip just ended.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.  (Also, sorry it took me so long to reply&#8211;my World Fantasy trip just ended.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaolin Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.eugenefischer.com/2009/10/23/behind-the-scenes-at-asimovs-on-the-sofanauts/comment-page-1/#comment-5349</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaolin Fire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eugenefischer.com/?p=1501#comment-5349</guid>
		<description>Regarding the numbers &quot;inflation&quot; of the 80&#039;s--my impression is that advertising dollars were much stronger at that point; so it was worth &quot;selling&quot; subscriptions for nothing or next-to-nothing through places like publisher&#039;s clearinghouse for the raise in subscription numbers that then correlated to a significant raise in advertising dollars.

At some point, the amount lost on the fire-sale subscriptions no longer equalled the amount gained from advertisers, and they let that trick go...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the numbers &#8220;inflation&#8221; of the 80&#8242;s&#8211;my impression is that advertising dollars were much stronger at that point; so it was worth &#8220;selling&#8221; subscriptions for nothing or next-to-nothing through places like publisher&#8217;s clearinghouse for the raise in subscription numbers that then correlated to a significant raise in advertising dollars.</p>
<p>At some point, the amount lost on the fire-sale subscriptions no longer equalled the amount gained from advertisers, and they let that trick go&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

